Evan Williams wrote:
There's no way a R1R compares to a Rival, RS3, or ZII. It's not exactly cheap either, so the tire costs haven't changed much at all, and the life hasn't improved.
Since the ratings are supposed to be a DOT standard, I'm surprised they haven't gotten involved.
That's interesting. I only can speak from what I've read for S2000's, but autocross guys love the ZII star specs and the RS3 for hotter environments. R1R's seem to suffer from poor longevity while offering similar grip levels.
As far as DOT intervention, it's likely such a small volume issue that they don't have a reason to address it. Manufacturers are apparently allowed to advertise a treadwear number lower than what they test, but not the other way around. For Hankook, Toyo, etc.. it looks like they're just stamping the numbers higher, to a value more reflective of what the tire should have been.
I agree though, it's pretty ridiculous how its working out. Luckily it doesn't affect us much either way!