ATLANTIC REGION MOTOR SPORTS
The governing body of amateur motor sport within Atlantic Canada
ARMS Homepage
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 9:42 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 7:35 pm 
Offline
3rd Gear
3rd Gear
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 2:09 pm
Posts: 239
So this discussion has turned into whether or not non affiliated members of arms should be counted when tallying up the points for events. I'm hoping Ming can chime in on this.




Unfortunately I was checking my points for the regional events and the first in sackville I'm listed as having 9 points. From where I finished I believe I should have gotten 5.

Can somebody confirm this?


Last edited by Ben B on Wed Aug 13, 2014 4:11 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:40 am 
Offline
3rd Gear
3rd Gear
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 2:09 pm
Posts: 239
I'll take the extra points if no one wants to challenge this ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:12 am 
Offline
4th Gear
4th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:21 pm
Posts: 592
Location: Halifax
Well, you were 7th, so 5 points would seem correct. But the 2014 rules mention only the group championships, and does not mention awarding an overall. So it doesn't matter?

_________________
2009 Civic Hybrid. 1997 BMW 328iS
evanwritescars.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:22 am 
Offline
ARMS Performance Solo Director
ARMS Performance Solo Director
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 9:53 pm
Posts: 3599
I got 1 point for 8th overall pax at Slemon. Thought it should be 3 or 4. Also, I can't remember the exact wording but I thought that non members didn't play a part in our points this year. I'll have to look that up after.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:49 am 
Offline
5th Gear
5th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 12:43 am
Posts: 1109
Location: Halifax, NS
Brian Partridge wrote:
I got 1 point for 8th overall pax at Slemon. Thought it should be 3 or 4. Also, I can't remember the exact wording but I thought that non members didn't play a part in our points this year. I'll have to look that up after.

I thought the finish position of a non-member still rolls up the points for that position (i.e. they aren't pushed down to the next actual member) but could be wrong.

_________________
"Your car goes where your eyes go" - Enzo (the dog)

Brian Jarvis
Barbarian Mutter Werks Motorsports


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:50 am 
Offline
5th Gear
5th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:27 pm
Posts: 1205
Location: Halifax, NS
I asked about non-members in the other thread and this was what ming said:

Ming Wong wrote:
Scott Montgomerie wrote:
For the ARMS championship, will the PAX results be calculated between ARMS members only? For example, someone from SCCA paxes first in my class group, but I pax second. Do I end up with 20 points?

Interesting question. ARMS Regional Autoslalom Regulations, section 12.3.1 states:

Quote:
Competitors must have a valid full membership in an ARMS-affiliated club.


I've always read that as people outside the region don't get points, and I've always dropped them from MMSC's club championships points. I don't exclude them when assigning points though. So if someone outside finishes first and a MMSC member finishes second, the MMSC member gets 17 points assuming the class was full. I don't ignore that there were other competitors at the event.


Only 2 people in ARMS got more than a single point each day for the overall with the current scoring system. May want to add in some sort of nationals clause for next time because it really skews the results. You get punished for having national level competition show up to a single event, even if you outpax everyone from our region. But that is just my opinion.

_________________
'99 BMW M3 / "Elvic"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:19 am 
Offline
ARMS Secretary
ARMS Secretary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2007 11:03 pm
Posts: 968
Location: Fall River, NS
I agree. I believe out of region participants should be dropped for all purposes in determining points assignment for regional championships, meaning simply exclude them from the equation entirely as if they did not enter.

I suggest this be a topic for the annual workshop.

_________________
ASCC VP Membership
'01 DHG Mustang Bullitt #16
'22 Golf R


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:40 am 
Offline
5th Gear
5th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 11:25 am
Posts: 1062
Location: Moncton, NB
Agreed with Alan/Scott/whoever
People from out of ARMS shouldn't count in future years
Although it's only a major factor for Nationals-style event

_________________
Money ---> Heat and Noise

MMSC #12/ASP


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 2:13 pm 
Offline
ARMS Performance Solo Director
ARMS Performance Solo Director
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 9:53 pm
Posts: 3599
Especially now since the class structure has changed. For example, take FSP at Slemon. Two locals, Joel and I plus a non member of ARMS. Previously, we would in class need that person to make the class to have a chance at full points, since we had a full class we couldn't bump classes. But now with the class grouping, this point is no longer needed. And I thought I read somewhere that non members don't count anymore. As for overall, using the new system, pax, they shouldn't count for sure.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:18 pm 
Offline
3rd Gear
3rd Gear
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 2:09 pm
Posts: 239
Quote:
ARMS Regional Autoslalom Regulations, section 12.3.1 states: Competitors must have a valid full membership in an ARMS-affiliated club.


Interesting, Under 12.3.2 Scoring it states: For an entrant to be considered in a class, the entrant shall be a valid full member
of an ARMS affiliated club, a basic license holder, before the close of registration for that event.
Only competitors who fulfill this requirement are counted toward class/championship group size and points allotment for that event.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 12:27 am 
Offline
3rd Gear
3rd Gear
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 12:49 pm
Posts: 467
Location: Suitcase
I assumed they wouldn't count, and that the regional was a separate score sheet within nationals. Remove the non-arms people, and it would be as it should be.

_________________
https://my.flightradar24.com/Sadokist
http://www.twitter.com/sadokist
2017 Circuit Mont Tremblant Fall Classic - 3rd GTC
2017 Jack Canfield Memorial 3 Hour Enduro - 1st Overall
2019 CASC-OR Celebration of Motorsport - 1st GT2
NBSCC Race Director


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 9:19 am 
Offline
5th Gear
5th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:27 pm
Posts: 1205
Location: Halifax, NS
Ben B wrote:
Quote:
ARMS Regional Autoslalom Regulations, section 12.3.1 states: Competitors must have a valid full membership in an ARMS-affiliated club.


Interesting, Under 12.3.2 Scoring it states: For an entrant to be considered in a class, the entrant shall be a valid full member
of an ARMS affiliated club, a basic license holder, before the close of registration for that event.
Only competitors who fulfill this requirement are counted toward class/championship group size and points allotment for that event.


That seems pretty cut and dry to me. If you aren't an ARMS member, the event is scored as if you never competed.

_________________
'99 BMW M3 / "Elvic"


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:19 am 
Offline
3rd Gear
3rd Gear
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:14 am
Posts: 288
Location: Moncton, N.B.
I see no reason why correcting this needs to wait for the future. Common sense tells me it's not too late to change this. With non-ARMS competitors earning points, Slemon has been reduced to a lesser event than the other regionals when they should all be weighted equally. As it stands, I've been swindled at least 10 championship points for that weekend. I've missed a couple of regionals and switched classes mid season, so my season is largely a wash but I'd still like to salvage what I can. I feel sorry for those who are really going for the overall championship who also had a good weekend at the nationals. This is going to be an issue every year at Slemon, since we typically have guests from abroad.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:31 pm 
Offline
ARMS Performance Solo Director
ARMS Performance Solo Director
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 9:53 pm
Posts: 3599
I agree Richard, it'll be the event to miss points wise. I believe my points are messed up anyway. :roll:
Should be atleast 3 for Saturday I think. But still, whatever. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Aug 17, 2014 9:51 pm 
Offline
ARMS AutoSlalom Director
ARMS AutoSlalom Director
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 4:20 pm
Posts: 1313
Location: Fredericton, NB
I've updated the championship points page. I believe they are correct now.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:37 pm 
Offline
3rd Gear
3rd Gear
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:14 am
Posts: 288
Location: Moncton, N.B.
Excellent thanks. All is well in the universe once again. :orglaugh:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2014 2:43 pm 
Offline
3rd Gear
3rd Gear
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 2:09 pm
Posts: 239
Thanks Ming.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 2:59 pm 
Richard Hodge wrote:
As it stands, I've been swindled at least 10 championship points for that weekend.


I am sorry that this is how you feel when faced with tougher competition.

As a visiting competitor i have little say in your affairs but may I suggest you consider changing your approach to scoring rather than shaking your fist at the pesky vagabonds passing through....we didn't mean to swindle... :wink:


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 3:37 pm 
Offline
5th Gear
5th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 11:25 am
Posts: 1062
Location: Moncton, NB
I'm pretty sure I saw some masked bandits making off with my points in the back of a Suburu

_________________
Money ---> Heat and Noise

MMSC #12/ASP


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 4:09 pm 
Offline
4th Gear
4th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:21 pm
Posts: 592
Location: Halifax
Mike Pettipas wrote:
I'm pretty sure I saw some masked bandits making off with my points in the back of a Suburu


Is there a 'like' button on here somewhere? :mrgreen:

_________________
2009 Civic Hybrid. 1997 BMW 328iS
evanwritescars.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 5:44 pm 
Offline
ARMS Performance Solo Director
ARMS Performance Solo Director
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 9:53 pm
Posts: 3599
thgear wrote:
Richard Hodge wrote:
As it stands, I've been swindled at least 10 championship points for that weekend.


I am sorry that this is how you feel when faced with tougher competition.

As a visiting competitor i have little say in your affairs but may I suggest you consider changing your approach to scoring rather than shaking your fist at the pesky vagabonds passing through....we didn't mean to swindle... :wink:


Hey thgear, I know he didn't mean it in an offensive way. The way our points used to be was we got points in class based on how we finished in our respective class. This way, we found we had to include non-members because that is what it took to make a class. However, those points weren't rewarded to non-members, but the points remained with them, as in if I finished behind say you, assuming you are not a member of ARMS, I don't get your points, I got the points that I finished in.
Now, our overall championship is based on pax. And, with the top 5 going to non-members, if the points stay with them, really, most members get 1 point each day. Logistics tell you now that the event to miss would be this one if one was going for the overall championship. Anyway, we found it not necessary to count non-members in our regional points chace now that we are basing points on pax. There are always atleast 3 people in an event to award full points. That being said, we enjoyed having every one of the "out of towners". Atleast I did. Did I meet you? Don't remember anyone named "thgear". :lol:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 7:20 pm 
Offline
5th Gear
5th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2002 3:01 pm
Posts: 1125
Location: NB
I think anyone complaining about receiving fewer points because of increased competition needs to have a long hard think about why they are competing.

_________________
Charles


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:38 pm 
Offline
5th Gear
5th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 11:25 am
Posts: 1062
Location: Moncton, NB
CharlesK wrote:
I think anyone complaining about receiving fewer points because of increased competition needs to have a long hard think about why they are competing.


The regional championship is intended to be a means of comparing the drivers of the region to each other, is it not?
I'll get 1 point either way, so I have no skin in the game, but I can see why people feel the way that they do

_________________
Money ---> Heat and Noise

MMSC #12/ASP


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:28 am 
Offline
3rd Gear
3rd Gear
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:14 am
Posts: 288
Location: Moncton, N.B.
thgear wrote:
Richard Hodge wrote:
As it stands, I've been swindled at least 10 championship points for that weekend.


I am sorry that this is how you feel when faced with tougher competition.

As a visiting competitor i have little say in your affairs but may I suggest you consider changing your approach to scoring rather than shaking your fist at the pesky vagabonds passing through....we didn't mean to swindle... :wink:


"Swindled" as in losing points due to a mistake in the scoring process. Originally the points were not tallied according to our regional rules. Is there something wrong with the expectation that we follow the rulebook properly? Would you be happy "ThGear" if the scoring procedure suddenly changed in your region throughout a season? This turned out to be a simple error and was corrected properly, nothing more. The issue is now dead and doesn't need sensationalizing by reading more into it than there was. This has nothing to do with our visiting guests, which is probably why this is a separate thread from the rest of the CAC conversation. If you knew who you were referring to, it would be obvious that I had welcomed you guys with open arms along with the rest of the locals. This was never sour grapes against visitors. Charles knows me better than this. He shouldn't have jumped on your bandwagon.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 10:29 am 
Offline
4th Gear
4th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:40 pm
Posts: 504
Location: Kentville
If something didn't happen according to the rules, or if a competitor feels the rules are applied incorrectly, then protest it. Or go to a club meeting and discuss it as an agenda item. These forum based arguments never go as planned, and expressing ourselves in text is a very challenging task.

Protests are the mechanism our sport uses to resolve these types issues. We need to learn how to use them correctly, and in a timely fashion.

_________________
Brent O'Connor
ASCC Member
MHPDC Volunteer
2007 Mustang GT
Kentville


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Aug 22, 2014 11:43 am 
Brian Partridge wrote:
The way our points used to be was we got points in class based on how we finished in our respective class. This way, we found we had to include non-members because that is what it took to make a class.


I have always had an issue with the hard points for position type scoring. Especially in an event with many participants scattered across many classes.

The system we use in Ontario (for both the regional autocross and our time attacks) is points out of 100 correlated to the time difference of everyone slower than the fastest competior.

So if 60s pax nets you 1st place, you get 100 points. 61s nets you 98.36; 62s nets you 96.77; 70s would net you 85.71... etc

Probably the biggest benefit of this is that if the top 10 people are all less than 1 second of each other, they will all receive high points for that event, which not only eliminates the concept of a "sure winner" half way through the season (unless someone is really really good) by maintaining a very tight spread of points, but also makes such cases of when out of towners come in that it doesn't obliterate the scoring of your whole season.

and on the one hand Richard Hodge is correct that regionals are there to focus on those competitors in the region.... but on the other hand this is a sport that is fluid in it's competitor base and at the crux of it your competition is that which shows up that day. If you score poorly that day then that is your throw-away for the season...

We have the occasional people come up from the states from time to time, usually ones that do really well... but they're also no different that the occasional LOCAL drivers who are either retired or not taking the season so seriously, who come out for 1 or 2 events, completely dominate their class, and then never show up until next year. Same for high-caliber drivers who constantly co-drive different classes at all the events, they tend to throw a wrench in the system as well, but such is the nature of it.

Anyway, again I apologize if I rustled some jimmies and I know that I have little say but I do feel the need to comment just because we're all in this together in one way or another.

Brian Partridge wrote:
Did I meet you? Don't remember anyone named "thgear". :lol:


thgear is my CASC forum handle. My name is Serge and I was the white FRS driver, car #91. I didn't meet many of the drivers but I did have a talking to some of the organizers.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 6:12 am 
Offline
3rd Gear
3rd Gear
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 7:14 am
Posts: 288
Location: Moncton, N.B.
"Rustling Jimmies" has been your intention all along. We are not in this together at a regional level and our regional points rules are cut and dry. You have no say in this. :|


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:09 am 
Offline
ARMS Performance Solo Director
ARMS Performance Solo Director
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 9:53 pm
Posts: 3599
I like that way Serge, that makes sense. Would work all around. That just may be "the answer". :wink:
And as far as rustling jimmies, I was expecting you to say feathers, given my last name. :orglaugh:
No harm done, in fact quite possibly a lot of good done. A topic for our AGM. 8)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 11:20 am 
Offline
5th Gear
5th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 11:25 am
Posts: 1062
Location: Moncton, NB
Isn't that how the time attacks here are scored?

_________________
Money ---> Heat and Noise

MMSC #12/ASP


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 11:37 am 
Offline
ARMS Performance Solo Director
ARMS Performance Solo Director
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2002 9:53 pm
Posts: 3599
Yes, it is.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group