ATLANTIC REGION MOTOR SPORTS
The governing body of amateur motor sport within Atlantic Canada
ARMS Homepage
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 6:52 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 12:18 am 
Offline
1st Gear
1st Gear

Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:59 pm
Posts: 15
Is there a particular ratio the car has to meet to pass?
Like the stock 500 fails but if I drop one a quarter of an inch it passes?
The best a few minutes on google could get me is a rigid chat of "This particular car passes, this one fails" but a formula was mentioned a few times. Wondering if anyone knew the math off the top of their heads.

_________________
Here at Whynot Performance.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 1:59 am 
Offline
1st Gear
1st Gear

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:13 pm
Posts: 24
Location: Halifax
My understanding is that vehicles with track width greater than their height are OK, unless they're explicitly excluded.

In the case of the non-Abarth 500s and other cars that are in the "excluded from Street category" list, I don't know whether or not making sure they follow that guideline is enough to include them in the higher categories. I imagine if you were going to run any kind of sticky rubber you'd want to be more than just barely under the line.

edit: For what it's worth, looks like when they're classing cars they want (0.5 track / height of C of G) to be at least 1.3. Here's the text in the SCCA draft (SSF is static stability factor):
Quote:
SSF is defined as ½ track width (T) divided by the height of the center of gravity above the road (H) and can be calculated by the formula SSF=T/2H.
Vehicles with an SSF of less than 1.30 should not be permitted to compete in Solo® events due to the higher risk of rollover.

_________________
#22 FS - '06 BMW M3 convertible


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 12:06 pm 
Offline
4th Gear
4th Gear
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 8:40 pm
Posts: 504
Location: Kentville
The info above is correct from my reading of the ASN rules. The SCCA rules include some extra details. This (below) is the section that the classification section of the book refers to when it mentions section 3.2. There is still a lot a copy and paste in our rules, and proof reading still isn't catching the missing parts, despite raising it with ASN regularly.


Attachments:
2016-03-11 11.01.11.png
2016-03-11 11.01.11.png [ 498.12 KiB | Viewed 6006 times ]

_________________
Brent O'Connor
ASCC Member
MHPDC Volunteer
2007 Mustang GT
Kentville
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 10:46 pm 
Offline
1st Gear
1st Gear

Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 3:59 pm
Posts: 15
Thank you for your help!

_________________
Here at Whynot Performance.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group