Dave Hull wrote:
Rather than dropping events or using double points I think that the Time Attack style scoring is the fairest method of scoring for all.
I must have missed this, but to me they were 2 separate issues. I think the time attack system is definitely more interesting but I wouldn't agree that if we adopt it we shouldn't drop any events. I'm not for any doublepoints either, as Brian said if that is the one you miss you're still screwed.
Dropping one event (if we have a reasonable amount, 7 or more?) is what I would like to vote for, unfortunately by proxy. I just think not dropping sucks for those who want to compete but are unable to make every event. This isn't professional racing, things get in the way sometimes. And for those who can make it to every event they get the chance to increase their standing. For people who care about points, I can't see them skipping anything before the last event, especially if you go with time attack style scoring. For those that don't care, will not dropping an event really change anything?
Dave Hull wrote:
The reason we went away from dropping events was that very few say from Halifax would travel to an event in Fredericton or Saint John if you were allowed to drop 1 or 2 events. The same would hold true for travel in the other direction as well.
Stats from this year. Numbers may not be 100% accurate. Only includes timed entries with an ARMS membership.
-8 people went to all 8 events (7% of 115 total unique entries).
-18 people went to 7 events (16% of 115)
-21 entries in all 4 NB events. 39 did 3/4.
-11 NS club members attended all NB events. 19 did 3/4.
-10 NB club members attended all NB events. 20 did 3/4.
-15 entries in all 4 NS events. 27 did 3/4.
-15 NS club members attended all NS events. 25 did 3/4.
-0 NB club members attended all NS events. 2 did 3/4.
It already hasn't held true in 2014.
On a positive note, average attendance has been going up. 30 in 2011, 31 in 2012, 35 in 2013 and 44 in 2014. Even if you exclude nats/SJ the 2014 average is still 35.